For them to attain marriage equality with the rest of us, people who identify as bisexual, must immediately be allowed to practise “different sex bigamy”. The governments of the world (if indeed they still be plural) must all immediately allow each self-identified “bisexual” person to marry two spouses, one a husband, the other a wife.
If the state must allow different sex bigamy for self-identified bisexual people, they may not deny it to anybody. Nor may they deny others same sex bigamy, if that is what they want.
In the USA, all this is apparently attainable without any legislation. The Supreme Court can simply rule that different sex bigamy is a Constitutional right, by correctly interpreting the US Constitution. Apparently all that is needed is for a self-identified “bisexual” would-be bigamist to bring a well-crafted test case, at which my own simple argument set out in the previous paragraphs could be advanced.
Can anybody fault the logic of my legal argument for the right to different sex bigamy, using a counter-argument that does not equally refute the right to same sex marriage, which in the present climate would amount to a reductio ad absurdam refutation of his purported counter-argument?
No? Then please remember in years to come, who was the first to demand the right to different sex bigamy. I suspect that it shall have been I.
My idea today is surely an idea whose time shall come. Isn’t it?