In 2017, on this page, in connection with my fifth Parliamentary candidacy, I referred to the threatened queering of primary education. We have since begun to witness this. For example there is a well-researched article here about one now-c0ntroversial project, called No Outsiders, that was set up in 2006 with the aim of “queering” primary education.
There has been a rumpus at two of Birmingham’s 258 primary schools, where indoctrination of the children aimed at procuring LGBT-acceptance had been introduced clandestinely, without the knowledge, let alone the permission, of the parents of the children who had thus been indoctrinated. Or so it has been said.
There has been a jolly informative debate about this in the House of Commons. The MP who brought that debate has been rewarded with calls for his deselection and deprivation of the party whip. Charming.
It is no secret that the purpose of the various initiatives to “queer” primary education is to bypass a generation. Plan A, converting parents to LGBT beliefs, persuading them to abandon their former, non-LGBT beliefs, and leaving them to raise their children as LGBT believers instead, hadn’t produced the rapid results hoped for, on the part of those who believed that it might be possible, and was desirable, to bring about a durable utopia of universal LGBT-acceptance. Therefore, a Plan B was needed. Let the children be indoctrinated (and inoculated) against their own parents’ heteronormativity before they had even learnt to think for themselves, lest they might resist such indoctrination as their parents had resisted it and were still resisting, the parents presumably not having themselves been targeted young enough. No need to ask the parents if Plan B was OK with the parents. They’d only say no anyway, and there was no intention to take no for an answer, so why even bother to ask?
In Birmingham, the council has sued, as named defendants, three of those who have protested against the queering of one of the two queered schools in Birmingham. The case hasn’t yet been tried, but the court has already granted the council a variety of interim injunctions pending trial. Here are the judgment and the press summary following the most recent hearing.
The interim injunctions concerned have been mainly about not putting on the almost daily demonstrations quite as close to the school gates as before. If they had stopped with that, I might not be writing about this court case now. But the council’s lawsuit isn’t just against the three named defendants. It is against a fourth defendant too, “persons unknown”. The interim injunctions issued include restrictions on the free speech of everybody on the planet, to write about this important conflict between parent-power and teacher-power, even bloggers who were never likely to set foot in Birmingham to join street demonstrations.
For this reason, I find myself in court again, on Friday 13th September, seeking once again to defend free speech as I have done before, making this application to be added as a defendant representative of the class of persons unknown with the same interests as mine.
Homophobia, transphobia and culture: deconstructing heteronormativity in English primary schools
Cet animal est très méchant. Quand on l’attaque, il se défend.
JohnAllman.UK 
You mention plan A and plan B but hide from your readers plans C, D and E. And plan 65yz, of course.
David Icke (also a Brexiter) is one of the few men in England with the courage to mention plan M(6) – according to his revelations, the reptilians have built mind control machinery on the dark side of the moon and use it whenever they fancy.
Think about that, John for a few months – even if “persons unknown” wins his/her case, the reptilians with their moon based technology will just turn the dials on their machines to make things worse somewhere else.
What you lot really need is a guaranteed way to protect all our vulnerable minds from outside influence – I often imagine a sort of Vegan baseball cap with a built in Faraday cage and Bose style noise cancelling technology.
I’d invent it myself but I’m too busy watching dramas on Netflix – just like the Illuminati planned when they first built the internets and tricked us al into paying 30 quid a month for super fast broadband.
We can not win this war, John. Satan, the reptilians, the illuminati, the league of shadows and the National Union of teachers are simply too many. We’ll all be gay before Christmas.
Twit.
John as a Christian I find your comments difficult and embarrassing. Unlike you I have been in Parkfield school, know members of staff, have seen and heard the demonstrations, read the protest literature, and above all been struck by the dishonest, untruthful at times, and misleading nature. Is a cause worth supporting when it has to be based on lies? While I cannot comment on the two comments quoted as coming from children, I can confirm that some comments used by the protest group as coming from children ARE untrue, events quoted simply never happened
A simple question for those who grew up before 1980, how were children treated at school if their parents were divorced? Thank goodness such social ostracisation doesn’t happen now.
Just as a reminder for Christians and non Christians alike, Christianity is open to all, there are no outsiders, and the church is an organisation for those who don’t belong. Finally, if Jesus is the way, the truth and the life, why are you supporting those with a more flexible approach to truth, and if God is love, why are you saying some people should have the right to be abusive? I certainly don’t see this as a Christian way.
I am not saying, “some people should have the right to be abusive”. I am saying that, in my experience, there are those who regard any criticism as abuse, and that a person who is exempt from abuse, is de facto exempt from criticism, however deserved that criticism may be.
Do you intend to come to court tomorrow?
Pingback: And then I go and spoil it all by saying something stupid, like “fag”? | JohnAllman.UK